Things That Matter

AOC’s Average Priced Haircut Has Set Off A Twitter Storm On The Right But She’s Clapping Back

There is a lot that offends people about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: her Green New Deal, her socialism, her dancing, her previous employment as a bar-tender, and now, apparently, her hair.

On Wednesday, a story from a conservative news outlet that shall not be named—nor linked to—attempted to manufacture outrage over Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s hair salon bill: There was a reported $80 cut, $180 for lowlights, and pure speculation about a $52 tip, for a grand total of approximately $312. The message? How dare a democratic socialist—and someone in the public eye whose appearance very much matters, for better or for worse—get a haircut at market price for a major metropolis?

Other publications have subsequently seized on the invented “controversy,” even if no one seems truly mad about it except for conservative talking heads. On the contrary, much of the outrage online seems to be on AOC’s behalf—that harping on her haircut is typical sexism and hypocrisy. How quickly the right is quick to ignore Mitt Romeny’s comparably priced $70 cut back in 2011, or John Edward’s $1,250 hair bills from 2007.

But as usual there isn’t much need to come to AOC’s defense when, in fact, no one is better at crafting the perfect response to hypocrisy and nonsense than AOC herself.

According to the paper, a self-described Democratic-Socialist shouldn’t be paying fair market price for a haircut.

“The self-declared socialist, who regularly rails against the rich and complains about the cost of living inside the Beltway, spent nearly $300 on her hairdo at a pricey salon she frequents in downtown Washington…” the article began.

Many on the right were incensed that the congresswoman hadn’t paid a visit to the subsidized Capital Hill barbershop.

Others drew attention to the article’s assertion that Ocasio-Cortez “could have saved roughly $100 for the same hairstyle at the government-subsidized Capitol Hill barbershop”.

“Her high-dollar hairdo stands in stark contrast to that of former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a former senator from Alabama who is a regular customer at Senate Hair Care Services,” the article said.

“At that place, open to members of Congress and the public, a men’s cut runs about $20, though men’s haircuts there and everywhere else are cheaper than women’s,” the article acknowledges.

Many questioned the choice of Jeff Sessions as a model. “Damn, why didn’t AOC ask for a rec from hair icon *checks notes* Jeff Sessions?” wrote one person.

Of course, AOC had the perfect response to all this BS.

The New York congresswoman noted that if you’re mad about her $80 haircut, which, by the way, she paid for herself, you’re bound to hate vice president Mike Pence’s $600,000 limo bill from his official visit to Ireland last month, which, according to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Pence billed to taxpayers.

Citing State Department contracts, CREW writes that Pence racked up the steep bill because, despite meetings in Dublin, the VP elected to drive four hours away in order to stay at…you guessed it…President Trump’s golf resort in Doonbeg.

So why is AOC’s private salon bill up for debate while Pence’s public limo tab flies under the radar? Sexism. Pure and simple.

And women on Twitter defended the Congresswoman, saying the ones who should be checking their privilege in the haircare wars were men.

It’s obvious men clearly have no idea how much women were routinely charged for haircuts and colour treatments.

“Sorry, you don’t get to create beauty standards that require women to spend hundreds or thousands a year to be considered presentable and then hate us for it,” tweeted the writer Jessica Valenti.

Right now it’s her hair, but the right has come for AOC for so many different things it’s hard to keep track.

And let’s be real. Even if AOC had followed the ‘advice’ and got a $20 bowl cut, she’d still drive them crazy because she is both effective and polished – a fact that makes her feel all that more threatening to her critics.

In the past, her clothes were the “controversy,” from that from-behind photo taken without her consent and tweeted (and later deleted) to the manufactured “outrage” over the borrowed $3,000 Gabriela Hearst suit she wore, fleetingly, for a photo shoot in Interview magazine. It’s almost as if people don’t think AOC deserves to dress, and look, the part of congresswoman.

Reliably, AOC had the sharpest reply to the latest wave of attention around her appearance. “Our policies, like Medicare for All, advance prosperity for working people,” she tweeted on Thursday of Democratic socialism. As for her critics: “They’re just mad we look good doing it.” Now that’s a hair flip.

AOC Wins Primary Election In New York In Run For A Second Term In Congress

Things That Matter

AOC Wins Primary Election In New York In Run For A Second Term In Congress

Stephanie Keith / Getty Images

Voters of New York’s 14th District handed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a decisive victory. The incumbent, who is running for a second term in the House of Representatives, dominated the election. AOC’s victory proves that her 2018 win was not a fluke.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated her rivals in the New York Democratic primary.

The first-term congresswoman is the clear nominee for the Democratic ticket in November. With close to 20,000 more votes than her closest competitor, it is clear that voters of New York’s 14th District want AOC to continue to represent them in Congress. The young politician has become a household name because of her unapologetic progressive platform demanding change and justice.

AOC’s impressive victory is catching people’s attention across the country.

AOC proves that the majority of Americans are coming around to the progressive platform. The progressive platform includes Medicare For All, Immigration Reform, Police Reform, and The Green New Deal. Progressive candidates are running for office nationwide after experiencing the overwhelming progressive victories in 2018. Those midterm elections laid the groundwork for more of these politicians.

Leading up to the election, AOC’s primary challenger eft behind politics and tried to use personal attacks.

Michelle Caruso-Cabrera’s campaign embraced Wall Street money and it proved not to work. The former Republican was hoping to unseat AOC after switching parties a few years prior. Caruso-Cabrera faced backlash from Democratic voters because of her book “You Know I’m Right: More Money, Less Government.” The book advocates for eliminating Medicare and Social Security, which are two Republican talking points.

AOC has proven to be a force in American politics.

According to Congress.gov, AOC has sponsored 29 pieces of legislation. This includes H.R. 6989, which aims to prevent mergers between major corporations during the COVID-19 pandemic, and H.R. 7221, which aims to ban police officers from using chemical weapons on protesters.

Congratulations on your win, AOC!

It is all up to the voters in November when AOC will run for her second term against a Republican challenger.

READ: AOC Doesn’t Want Us To Go Back To 70-Hour Work Weeks When We Reopen The Economy

AOC Doesn’t Want Us To Go Back To 70-Hour Work Weeks When We Reopen The Economy

Things That Matter

AOC Doesn’t Want Us To Go Back To 70-Hour Work Weeks When We Reopen The Economy

CSPAN

For the past month and a half, the United States has seen a sweep of stay-at-home orders meant to protect communities and individuals from the deadly coronavirus. While these mandates have worked to “flatten the curve” of causing hospitals to be overwhelmed they have also caused massive job loss amongst Americans. Which is why many have taken to the streets to push back against quarantine orders and secure their jobs back.

Still, at this time researchers have tirelessly tried to explain that reopening the economy is not in the best interest of public health, or the country.

That’s why when President Donald Trump took to Twitter to encourage online extremist communities to push back against orders, many of us were not thrilled.

In a series of tweets last Friday, Trump called to “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!” Later he called to “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” and “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in particular, was not amused. In a recent interview with VICE, AOC slammed President Trump’s support of protesters calling to “liberate” various states from their lockdown orders.

“Only in America, does the president, when the president tweets about liberation, does he mean ‘Go back to work,’” the progressive legislator said. “We have this discussion about ‘going back’ or ‘reopening’ — I think a lot of people should just say, ‘No, we’re not going back to that. We’re not going back to working 70-hour weeks just so that we can put food on the table and not feel any sort of semblance of security in our lives.”

In another portion of the interview, Ocasio-Cortez talked about the virus’s impact on her district.

“I have to call family members, congregations, and people in our community offering condolences day in and day out. I have to talk to teenage kids who have lost their parents. I have to talk to spouses that have lost their husband or wife of several decades,” Ocasio- Cortez said speaking of her district which encompasses Queens and the Bronx.

. “I have to talk to people who have lost their pastor or who have lost their imam or who have lost their spiritual leader of their community, and you know, I have to talk to people who say, ‘Where am I going to get my next meal,’ or ‘Am I going to be evicted from my apartment next month?’”