Things That Matter

According To One Anti-Immigrant Politician, Undocumented Immigrants Are To Blame For American Politics

Republicans are getting desperate. While President Donald Trump may think he has the 2020 presidential election in the bag, his GOP party isn’t so sure. For example, several Republican politicians are resigning from office or not seeking re-election. The slew of sudden departures from office ahead of the 2020 elections could be signaling a weakening of the Republican party. Isn’t he creating more jobs, helping the economy, and making this country great again? The country doesn’t seem to think so. His poll numbers are in the tank, as they have been for his entire presidential career, so will the Republican party be able to secure domination in the next election? They’ve already lost their majority in the House. Democratic organizations are funding campaigns against vulnerable Republicans in 2020 hoping to take back the Senate and the White House. There’s at least one Republican politician that is showing his desperation regarding the 2020 election and will do just about anything to sway votes his way. 

Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King is claiming that because there are so many undocumented immigrants, in some states — mainly California — they have more Representatives for that population because it is so big. 

Credit: @1380KCIM / Twitter

Rep. King is directly alleging that because California has so many undocumented immigrants, the state is required to have more Representatives elected into office to balance out the population. Now you’re probably thinking, how could Rep. King make that kind of allegation without proof or actual statistics to back up his claims?  Well, he does. 

Rep. King is citing a 2007 report published by an anti-immigration group as proof for his allegations

Credit; @FAIRImmigration / Twitter

“There was a study done in 2007 by FAIR — Federation for American Immigration Reform — they just estimated that there were six seats in California alone that wouldn’t exist if they didn’t have an illegal population,” Rep. King said during an event in Iowa in August where he spoke to a conservative audience. 

The Federation for American Immigration Reform may give off the impression that it is a “fair” group, but it’s far from it. The group is an anti-immigration organization that was founded by John Tanton a white nationalist

For further proof, King also included false information that stated the Department of Homeland Security had interdicted 4,117 migrants in a single day. However, the information he spewed on that day was inaccurate as well because ICE does not round up that many undocumented people every single day. His entire formula was off and even the people who he was speaking to knew that. 

“That was mind-boggling,” Tom Emmerson, an 82-year-old that attended the event in Iowa told Rolling Stone. “It just didn’t make any sense.”

Rep. King is the same representative that went after Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and drank out of a toilet to prove to people that it’s okay for immigrants inside detention centers to drink from the toilet.

Credit: @SteveKingIA / Twitter

King said that he “went into that cell where it was reported that they were advised they had to drink out of the toilet.” He then “took a drink out of there. And actually pretty good! So I have a videotape and I smacked my lips,” he said, according to the New York Post. “It’s not drinking out of the toilet, it’s drinking out of the water foundation that’s integral with the back of the toilet.”

In response to Rep. King’s fiasco, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted, “there is a genre of videos where GOP House members — who clearly didn’t read sworn testimony that detention sinks were broken – filming themselves drinking out of toilet sinks. They’re so anti-immigrant they risk pink-eye to show off that they didn’t do the reading #CloseTheCamps.”

This isn’t the first time Rep. King has made incredibly outrages remarks. In January, Rep. King was stripped of his seat on a judiciary committee because he asked what was so offensive about white supremacy. 

Credit: @AdamSchiff / Twitter

In a New York Times interview, Rep. King said he totally supports immigration as long as it is done legally and if those that come to this country assimilate to white culture. “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” Rep. King said in the Times. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?” While some of his party members denounced these comments, President Trump never did. 

Rep. King also has a confederate flag at his office. What more is there to say about the character of this man?

READ: President Trump Shares Reelection Support Video Prominently Displaying White Supremacist Symbolism

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com

Joe Biden Walks Away With Final Presidential Debate On Healthcare, Covid, And Many Issues

Things That Matter

Joe Biden Walks Away With Final Presidential Debate On Healthcare, Covid, And Many Issues

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden sparred during the final presidential debate. The two presidential nominees debated on issues ranging from healthcare to immigration to Trump’s finances. President Trump started controlled and quickly lost control of his temperament and spiraled for much of the debate.

First, people are giving the praise to the moderator, journalist Kristen Welker.

Welker is a reporter and White House correspondent for NBC News. As moderator of the final presidential debate, Welker kept the conversation moving forward. She was also able to stop President Trump on numerous occasions when he began spiraling as the debate went on.

One of the most stunning moments was President Trump claims that low IQ immigrants show up to court dates.

“Only the really – I hate to say this, but those with the lowest IQ. They might come back,” Trump said.

That was President Trump’s response to a question about catch and release. The catch and release program allowed for immigrants to come to the U.S., declare their intent for asylum, and be released to, usually, family members. They are then given a court date to plead their case for asylum. An overwhelming number of asylum seekers do show up to their court cases to make sure they have the chance to seek asylum.

The Trump administration eliminated the program and began what is called “Remain in Mexico.” The current plan forces migrants to wait in other countries while waiting for their day in immigration court.

When given a chance to address the 545 migrant children missing their parents, President Trump claimed they were being taken care of.

President Trump dodged questions about healthcare.

The rushed confirmation of Supreme Court Justice pick Amy Coney Barrett could have serious repercussions for people and their health care. The Trump administration is going to be challenging the Affordable Care Act, also called Obamacare, in hopes of overturning the healthcare law. This would eliminate protections for people with preexisting conditions, including diabetes, cancer, and pregnancy.

There is currently a lot of debate over whether or not a Covid-19 diagnosis would become a preexisting condition. More than 220,000 Americans have contracted the virus and the Affordable Care Act is in jeopardy because of the Trump administration.

President Trump still hasn’t released his tax returns.

Recent news about President Trump’s taxes made national headlines. Americans learned that President Trump recently paid $750 in taxes and that the president has a private bank account in China. According to his own tax returns, Trump paid more than $188,000 in taxes to the Chinese government. The bank account was previously unknown information.

Joe Biden appealed to the American voters and families.

Biden avoided getting into arguments during the debate and kept focused on the issues and how they impacted the American family. From Covid to the economy, Biden touched on all of the issues that keep American families up at night. Biden offered plans to stop the spread of Covid-19 but promoting the use of masks and safely reopening the U.S. economy to boost the economy and save lives.

Viewers are calling the debate a victory for the Biden campaign.

Several snap polls form different organizations show that people consider Biden the winner of this debate. Biden told the American people that is was running to be the American president, not a Democrat president. Biden promised to be the president for all American people and to take care of everyone, regardless of whether or not they voted for him.

READ: The First Presidential Debate Went Off The Rails Fast And The Internet Had Fun With It

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com

Amy Coney Barrett Has Refused To Acknowledge That Systematic Racism Exists

Things That Matter

Amy Coney Barrett Has Refused To Acknowledge That Systematic Racism Exists

Pool / Getty

We know LGBTQ rights, birth control, and race are under threat as Amy Coney Barrett as President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee. We know that that conservative judge has been evasive in answering comments about her beliefs which, if appointed, would steer her in making fundamental decisions that could affect American citizens’ lives for decades. Still, though we knew things are bound to go sideways as most things under the Trump administration have, we didn’t realize that an educated woman living in today’s world would refuse to acknowledge a basic societal fact: that “systemic racism” exists in the United States.

In written responses submitted Tuesday night, Barrett repeated her refusal to say whether “systemic racism” exists in our country.

After Sen. Mazie Hirono, Democrat of Hawaii asked her to explain her view of the existence of “systemic racism” in the United States, Barret refused the opportunity to acknowledge its existence.

“At the hearing, you acknowledged that racism persists in our country, but you refused to answer where there is systemic racism, calling it a ‘policy question.’ You also refused to answer other questions based on your view that they are ‘policy questions,’” Hirono wrote in his questions. “What makes a statement a policy question rather than a question of fact?”

“I believe that racism persists in our country, but as I explained at the hearing, whether there is ‘systemic racism’ is a public policy question of substantial controversy, as evidenced by the disagreement among senators on this very question during the hearing,” Barrett replied. “As a sitting judge and judicial nominee, it would be inappropriate for me to offer an opinion on the matter.”

Barrett’s approach to the question is not totally uncommon. Previous Supreme Court nominees have avoided answering questions concerning precedent. Barrett clung to the approach during her confirmation hearing last week while sitting before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Barrett used this as a standard and repeatedly cited it as a reason for dodging questions.

Systemic racism exists within our country without question.

It persists in our academic settings, workplaces, as well as in our court and judicial system. The fact is that when a certain group dominates a majority of positions of decision-making power, others struggle to exist and get by let alone get ahead. For generations and right now, white people have been the dominating group with decision-making power and people of color have suffered as a result. Acknowledgment is a vital part of making this change. Particularly from our leaders.

The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on Barrett’s confirmation on Thursday afternoon.

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com