Things That Matter

‘Remain In Mexico’ Policy Is Drastically Cutting The Number Of Asylum Seekers Being Granted Asylum

The Trump administration’s overhaul of the U.S. asylum system has led to drastic changes in the number of migrants being granted asylum, according to data published by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse UniversityOf the more than 47,000 asylum seekers who had been involved in the controversial “Remain in Mexico” program by the month of September, only 11 individuals, or 0.1 percent, of all completed cases were granted asylum. Less 10,000 migrants had even completed their cases and of that group, 5,085 of those cases were ultimately denied while 4,471 cases were discharged with no verdict given, many of those based on protocol issues. 

The shocking numbers can be attributed to the Migrant Protection Protocols, a program mostly known as “Remain in Mexico,” which requires asylum seekers to wait near the southern border while their claims are processed in the U.S. court system. The program was introduced in January to widespread criticism and was aimed at having migrants wait near the U.S. border despite the overwhelming majority of them not meeting policy standards. 

These numbers highlight just how difficult the Trump administration has made it for migrants to be granted asylum. 

The reality for many migrants in the “Remain in Mexico” program is that their claims will take months to process with a majority never even seeing a judge. The Trump administration has also made the criteria for migrants to win asylum cases increasingly difficult and these numbers highlight this issue. 

According to the data, of the more than 47,300 people involved in the program, 47,091 of them were “never detained.” Only 181 were ever detained in U.S. custody with 41 people being ultimately being released. It is presumed that the rest of the migrants who weren’t detained were then assigned to wait in Mexico for their case proceedings. 

The 0.1 percent asylum grant rate stands out significantly in relation to the 20 percent of people who were granted asylum outside of the “Remain in Mexico” policy. The data also reveals that almost half of all asylum cases end up being denied, 48 percent, while a 30 percent “other” rate meaning that those asylum cases either ended without a decision being ultimately made, or were withdrawn. 

In July, the Trump administration also implemented an “asylum ban” policy which makes non-Mexican asylum seekers at the U.S. southern border ineligible for asylum unless they’ve already requested asylum in another country. This has all led to a growing number of migrants being turned away or has led them to cross the border illegally.

Making the asylum process even harder is the expansion of the metering program which forces migrants to wait multiple months in Mexico due to a “limited amount of space”. 

The expansion of the metering program has also added to the increasingly difficult challenges for migrants. The program has forced migrants to wait at the southern border for months which has resulted in many being put in dangerous conditions. Immigration and human rights groups have frequently called out the Trump administration for those policies claiming that asylum seekers are vulnerable to violence in nearby Mexican border towns. 

“I would say defunding Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) would be a critical mistake. It’s one of our most successful initiatives,” acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said in November. “Again, as I walk around and talk to the great men and women of Border Patrol and [Office of Field Operations] and others here — again, it’s critical to what they do each and every day to make sure that we can both control the flow, end catch and release.”

The metering expansion is being defended by officials at the Department of Homeland Security that say it is necessary since there is already limited room in holding facilities where migrants who enter the country without proper documentation are held. As of September, there are more than 10,000 migrants that are currently in Tijuana waiting to enter the U.S to legally apply for asylum. While there is no timetable for how long they have been waiting, many have shared stories of the long weeks that have turned into months as they wait to enter the U.S. This has led to some entering illegally or just giving up on the process altogether and heading back home. 

“There’s metering, there’s Remain in Mexico, there’s the new asylum ban. Basically, the process is blocking people from getting asylum,” Kennji Kizuka, senior researcher and policy analyst for Human Rights First, told the San Diego Tribune. 

Many migrants have been left with little to no options if seeking asylum. These latest numbers reveal the dangers that await a majority waiting at the U.S. southern border. 

For migrants waiting for their asylum cases to be processed in Mexico, they are forced to wait in dangerous conditions that are just as bad as the ones they are trying to escape. This situation has played out over the last year as numbers recorded and research by the Human Rights First group show a startling trend when it comes to asylum seekers who are part of the “Remain in Mexico” program. He “identified 636 reported cases of kidnapping, torture and another violent attack on asylum seekers,” which also includes “138 cases of kidnapping or attempted kidnapping of children.”

“There are people who just cannot take it anymore,” Kizuka said. “They would rather die at home than die in a foreign country where their families won’t be able to come for their remains and give them a proper burial.”

READ: A Chilean Military Plane With 38 People On Board Crashed While On The Way To A Base In Antarctica

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at

This Mexican College Student Is Going Viral For Breeding the Largest Bunnies In the World

Things That Matter

This Mexican College Student Is Going Viral For Breeding the Largest Bunnies In the World

Photo via yakinkiro/Instagram

Look out Bad Bunny. There’s another breed of bunny in town that’s taking the internet by storm. A college student in Mexico recently went viral for the oddest thing. He has genetically engineered a strain of rabbits to be the largest in the world.

21-year-old Kiro Yakin has become a viral sensation after internet users have seen him with pictures of the giant bunnies he genetically engineered.

Yakin, a student at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla on the Xicotepec campus, is studying veterinary and animal husbandry. He began his experimentation by breeding two unique rabbit types together. The Flemish Giant rabbit and other, longer-eared bunnies that Yakin happened to notice. As a result, his monster-bunny was born.

According to Yakin, his experimental bunnies grow up to 22 pounds  Flemish Giant, while the average Flemish giant weighs 15 pounds. But make no mistake, Yakin’s bunny experiment was no accident. “It takes an average of 3 to 4 years to reproduce this giant species,” he told Sintesis.

Yakin’s ultimate goal is to breed a rabbit that can grow up to 30 pounds. “I am currently studying genetics to see how to grow this breed of giant rabbits more,” he said.

Yakin, who has had a soft spot for rabbits since he was a child (pun intended), now cares for a whopping fifty giant rabbits out of his parents’ home.

Luckily, his parents are supportive enough of his dream that they support their son (and his bunnies) financially. “I have the financial support and support of my parents to buy food a week for all 50 giant rabbits,” Yakin told Sintesis.

But he also admitted his project has a long way to go. “So far I have not set aside the time or budget that is required to start the project more seriously,” he said.

The only thing that’s preventing Yakin from committing all his time and energy to creating even bigger bunnies is–what else?–money.

Photo via yakinkiro/Instagram

Although he already submitted a proposal to his university to try and expand his research, as of now, he is self-financed. However, Yakin makes a bit of extra cash by selling the giant bunnies to private customers.

His ultimate goal though, is to open up a large, professional farm where he can breed and cross-breed his bunnies to his heart’s content.

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at

The Principle Of A Florida School Was Captured Spanking An Undocumented Six-Year-Old Student With A Paddle


The Principle Of A Florida School Was Captured Spanking An Undocumented Six-Year-Old Student With A Paddle

Corporal punishment includes all sorts of cruel physical acts. They range from spanking, slapping, force-feeding, and pinching to pulling, twisting, and striking with an object. The act of corporal punishment has long been criticized for its part in causing greater damage than intended.

Though the effects might bring around immediate compliance, researchers have underlined that such changes in behavior are often only short-term and can increase aggressive behavior. Perhaps this is why the act has varying legal statuses across the country.

Elementary school principal Melissa Carter is learning her own lesson from corporal punishment, but not as the receiver.

The elementary school principal from Florida is being investigated by local authorities after her use of corporal punishment on a 6-year-old student was captured on camera.

Principal Melissa Carter and school clerk Cecilia Self used a paddle on the student last month as punishment for damaging a computer screen. According to local CBS affiliate WINK News, corporal punishment was performed on the child in front of their mother. The mother used her cell phone to record the paddling in a clip that has gone viral.

According to WINK News, a female employee from the school contacted the child’s mother on April 13 after her daughter allegedly damaged a computer.

The mother of the child, who speaks Spanish and not fluent English, said that she was confused by the allegations made against her daughter during the phone call. During the conversation the school employee had mentioned “paddling” but the mother didn’t understand what that meant because of her language barrier.

She had been under the impression that she had been brought to the school to pay a $50 fine. Instead, she was taken to Principal Carter’s office where her daughter and the principal were waiting.

Carter soon brought out a wooden paddle and smacked the six-year-old on the backside. The video recorded by the mothers shows the little girl crying in pain during the attack.   

The mother claimed she resisted intervening because she feared having her immigration status brought into question.

“Nobody would have believed me. I sacrificed my daughter, so all parents can realize what’s happening in this school,” told the local news about the incident. “The hatred with which she hit my daughter, I mean it was a hatred that, really I’ve never hit my daughter like she hit her. I had never hit her.”

Bret Provinsky, the mother’s attorney, said the State Attorney’s Office is currently reviewing the case to see whether they will pursue criminal charges against Carter and Cecilia Self.

Self was meant to translate for the mother, but the mother said she did not do so. “That’s aggravated battery. They’re using a weapon that can cause severe physical harm,” said Provinsky. “The child is terrified, she feels vulnerable. There’s nothing she can do in the hands of these adults, who treated her so brutally, savagely, sadistically.”

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at