Things That Matter

A Protester Demanded Elizabeth Warren Commit To Legalizing All Undocumented Immigrants On Day One

Just one day after Massachusetts Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren announced her plan for immigration reform, a protester interrupted her to demand a commitment to legalizing “all 11 million undocumented immigrants” on “Day One” of her presidency. 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren was talking about mass incarceration when an activist group redirected her attention to the humanitarian crisis catalyzed by American immigration laws.

Credit: @rafaelshimunov / Twitter

Warren was answering a question about her plan to end mass incarceration at the Netroots Nation conference when an activist group unrolled a massive sign that read “Legalize 11 Million. Reunify All Families. #DignityNotDeportation.” Then, a protester stood on her chair and shouted, “Will you commit to the immediate legalization of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country and the reunification of their families under the Obama administration and the Trump administration?”

“So I want to talk about undocumented immigrants,” Warren responded.

Credit: @rafaelshimunov / Twitter

She launched into a soundbite that offers hope but not the commitment the activist was searching for. “I would like to talk about an overhaul of our immigration system because that’s what we need,” she said. “It starts with the premise that immigration is good for this country. It makes us stronger. It makes our economy stronger, and it ties us to families all around the world.”

By the time the activist was escorted out of the room, Warren had offered a three-part plan.

Mediaite

“The first part, it starts with, is we need to expand legal immigration in this country. We’ve had families held apart for far too long, and that’s not who we are… Part Two: We need a path, and I will build, a path to citizenship, not just for dreamers, but for families. A path of citizenship that is both fair and attainable. It’s about workers. It’s about people who have been here for a long time, who have become integrated into our society. Part Three is I will stop this ugly mess at our borders. No great nation tears families apart. No great nation locks up children. We must, at the border, respect the dignity of every human being that comes here.”

The activist continued to shout during her answer demanding true commitment to legalize the presence of 11 million undocumented immigrants on Day One.

Credit: @rafaelshimunov / Twitter

By that point, a security officer was standing close to the activist, asking her to let Warren respond. He escorted her out of the room. Once outside, he told her that she should have let Warren respond. She said, “I gave her the opportunity to speak. I don’t need to talk to you. I need to talk to her and for her to commit as the future President of the United States.”

The activist is tired of hearing empty promises. She wants commitment.

Credit: @rafaelshimunov / Twitter

A reporter followed up with her outside the forum. “We need the immediate legalization of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country and the reunification of the families that were separated under the Obama and Trump era,” she told the reporter. “We need that commitment on Day One. We can’t keep saying that we’re going to fix the immigration system without commitment on Day One. This is something that she can do, that any presidential candidate can do, and we need commitment on Day One.”

The protest was organized by the non-profit organization Movimiento Cosecha.

Credit: @rafaelshimunov / Twitter

The organization is led by immigrants, for immigrants. In their Dignity 2020 plan, they list the three demands required by a presidential candidate to gain their endorsement. They need a presidential candidate to commit to: 

  1. “An end to all detention and deportation on your first day in office”
  2. “Immediate legalization for all 11 million undocumented immigrants”
  3. “Family reunification for everyone separated by detention and deportation”

The incident incited both racists and supporters online.

Credit: @mpsmissouri / Twitter

Of course, the majority of responders are MAGA folks degrading the brown body that spoke up and both her and Warren’s intelligence. On the other hand, folks without the privilege of citizenship are disappointed in her existing plan. It does provide a pathway to citizenship and offers more resources by the way of an independent immigration court system, but there are some elements that don’t feel quite right. Que te piensas?

Watch the full interaction below!

READ: What You Need To Know About Elizabeth Warren And Her Newly Unveiled Immigration Plan

Guatemala’s President Is Going To Have To Settle The Immigration Negotiation With Trump

Things That Matter

Guatemala’s President Is Going To Have To Settle The Immigration Negotiation With Trump

dr.giammattei / Instagram

Tuesday marked a new era of leadership in Guatemala as the Latin country swore in Alejandro Giammattei, a conservative doctor and former prison system director from the right-wing Vamos party. The 63-year-old won the presidency on his fourth attempt back in August with bold promises of changing a corrupt government and restoring the rule-of-law in city streets. 

“Today, we are putting a full stop on corrupt practices so they disappear from the face of this country,” Giammattei said at his swearing-in ceremony that had a five-hour delay.

His ceremony somewhat overshadowed by delays and protests against ex-President Jimmy Morales, who for four years dodged accusations of corruption. The scene of protestors throwing eggs and voicing anger at the outgoing administration was a reminder of the displeasure against the country’s deep-seated political corruption. It’s also a key reason why many are looking to Giammattei to bring change to the struggling country. 

As Giammattei takes office, there are questions on what his presidency will mean to Guatemala in the short and long term as issues over the future of an asylum deal with the United States comes into focus. 

One of the biggest issues confronting Guatemala and one that Giammattei will have to address early is the Asylum Cooperation Agreement (ACA) that was signed by Morales last July with the U.S. government. The agreement, which was highly opposed in Guatemala, lets U.S. immigration officials send Honduran and Salvadoran migrants that are requesting asylum at the U.S.-Mexican border to apply for protection here instead. There is now increasing skepticism as reports say that the U.S. wants to expand the deal to include Mexican asylum seekers as well.

Last year, there were many Guatemalans that were part of a 3,000 migrant caravan that made its way up from Latin America to the U.S. The caravan consisted of people that were looking to claim asylum and became a symbol of the growing migration crisis at the southern border. President Trump frequently attacked the caravan and eventually threatened to impose tariffs on Guatemala if it didn’t agree to the asylum deal.

According to the Guatemalan Migration Institute, “as of Friday, 128 Salvadoran and Honduran asylum seekers had been sent as part of the agreement,” with only a limited number actually applying for asylum there and others returning home. Giammattei has previously said that he’s willing to make changes to the agreement but on Tuesday said he would revisit details later. 

The country, one of Latin America’s poorest nations, is a key part of President Trump’s plan to curb illegal immigration and asylum claims. mostly from those coming to the U.S. Southern border. The issue for many living in Guatemala is how to let those seeking asylum when itself has become a major source of U.S. bound migrants. 

Poverty levels have only grown in the last 20 years and income inequality levels continue to be a big problem in the country. 

One of the big platform issues that Giammattei ran his campaign on was helping the shorten income inequality gap and poverty levels that have only grown in the last 20 years. Fifty-nine percent of Guatemalan citizens live below the poverty line and almost 1 million children under the age of 5 are believed to live with chronic malnutrition, according to the AP. 

There is also the rampant problem of street violence and cartel gangs that have had a major effect on the daily lives of many in the country. Giammattei plans to address this with reforms that include designating “street gangs as terrorist groups.”

“This is the moment to rescue Guatemala from the absurd. It is the moment to combat corruption and malnutrition,” Giammattei said on Tuesday in his first address to the country as president. “There is no peace without security, I will present a law that aims to declare street gangs for what they are – terrorist groups.”

There is hope that Giammattei will turn a new page in Guatemala that will see change come to all in the country that has faced uncertainty for years. But only time will tell if this is indeed new leadership or business as usual.

“We will bring back the peace this country so dearly needs,” Giammattei said. “We will govern with decency, with honourability, and with ethical values.”

READ: In Efforts To Double Latino Representation In Hollywood, LA Mayor Eric Garcetti Unveils New Historic Initiative

CNN Is The Big Loser Of Last Night’s Democratic Debate After All Hell Breaks Loose Between Bernie And Warren

Things That Matter

CNN Is The Big Loser Of Last Night’s Democratic Debate After All Hell Breaks Loose Between Bernie And Warren

CNN / YouTube

If you were watching the Democratic Debates live last night you may have noticed one trending hashtag #CNNisTrash. Many Twitter users felt that CNN flubbed the debate asking leading questions to each candidate, particularly progressives like Senator Bernie Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren, and barely touching subjects like climate change, gun control, police brutality, and reproductive rights. 

The crassest part of the evening was the CNN moderator stoking the media-incited rivalry between allied progressives Sanders and Warren. The two appeared to have entered frenemy territory this week when it was revealed Sanders’ volunteers were using negative talking points about Warren while canvassing. Then four sources leaked to CNN that Sanders told Warren a woman couldn’t win the presidency in 2018. 

CNN asked both senators about the former incident, which many felt was an attempt to pit progressive candidates against each other and distract from real issues. 

Democratic debate so white.

With Senator Cory Booker dropping out of the race, Andrew Yang and Deval Patrick are the only non-white candidates in the running but they did not qualify for the debate.  While the primary started out with its most diverse set of candidates, only the whitest and wealthiest have been able to garner enough support to stick out the excruciatingly long election season.

Time and time again, experts have pointed out that the primary process too often favors wealthy white males over women and non-white candidates. 

Sanders and Warren refused to take CNN’s bait last night.

Moderator Abby Phillip first asked Sanders about the sexist comment. Sanders denied ever making it. Rather than attacking Warren, he pivoted to the fact that Hillary Clinton won the nomination (over him no less) and that she won the popular vote. 

“Well, as a matter of fact, I didn’t say it. And I don’t want to waste a whole lot of time on this, because this is what Donald Trump and maybe some of the media want. Anybody who knows me knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman cannot be President of the United States,” Sanders said. 

Warren maintained her account of events without attacking Sanders.

“I disagreed,” she said. “Bernie is my friend, and I am not here to try to fight with Bernie. But, look, this question about whether or not a woman can be president has been raised, and it’s time for us to attack it head-on.” 

Warren made a salient point about women’s ability to win elections when they choose to run. 

“Look at the men on the stage – collectively they’ve lost 10 elections,” Warren said. “The only people on this stage who have won every single election that they’ve been in are the women. Amy and me.” 

She also noted that she and Senator Amy Klobuchar are the only candidates to beat republican incumbents in roughly 30 years.

#NeverWarren is the number one trend in the U.S.

Some Sanders supporters appear unable to take the lead from their candidate of choice. A behind the scenes moment where Warren and Sanders have a tense conversation has caused many followers to speculate about what was said. Some Sanders supporters say Warren refused to shake his hand.

Twitter has since been flooded with accusations that Warren lied about Sanders’ 2018 comment (with little evidence) and #NeverWarren is now trending. Sanders’ more reasonable followers have chalked things up to a misunderstanding between two friends.

Could all of this anti-Warren drama be due to Russian influence?

Either way, Warren is on the receiving end of a great deal of vitriol which many believe is a coordinated effort by Russian bots to stoke division since neither progressive can win the nomination without the support of the other. A Warren or Sanders presidency will mean bad news for Russia. 

CNN’s questions made them the big losers of the night.

There is much criticism of how political pundits cover elections like a horse race or a soap opera, looking for soundbites, drama, and conflict rather than covering policy and the real stakes for American people. Twitter users seemed to agree that CNN’s democratic debate was by far the worst yet. 

CNN did not address the conservative court-packing of federal judges who are often rated as not qualified for their lifetime appointments. 

CNN did not talk about the president’s unsettling behavior which many believe to be is Trump’s mental unraveling

Why is everyone so intent on not mentioning the obvious dangers that the current president and his administration pose to the country and the world?

Many question the entire debate process after it’s quite obvious the media doesn’t treat progressive politicians and policies in the same way it does long standing traditional ones.

But perhaps the biggest cause of ire was the constant questions about how Democrats will pay for basic entitlements like universal healthcare, childcare, and college with little interrogation about how the government always manages to allocate billions for endless wars and walls. 

Many felt that rather than using the debate as a tool to inform the American people, the moderators were instead reinforcing conservative talking points. 

The general reception of the debate was that the candidates kept their cool and were cordial to one another, despite CNN’s repeated attempts to court drama. 

The candidates won the debate by dodging leading questions and centering their policies and vision for America.