Culture

Surprise! People Who Live In Neighborhoods With More Immigrants Eat Healthier And Weigh Less

New research has emerged, showing that people who live in neighborhoods that boast a larger immigrant population eat better than those that don’t. For all of us who’ve lived in neighborhoods with a considerable immigrant population, this news is probably as startling as the revelation that water is wet. But, it’s important that bona fide research is conducted on the things that we already feel in our gut – in this case, literally – because it proves that, yes, we have good reason to think the things that we do.

Give us the highlights of the study.

Instagram / @picturesofmagicmoments

The researchers found three main things when they conducted the study. Firstly, that native-born Americans who live in neighborhoods with a higher immigrant population tend to eat less fast food and more fruit and vegetables than their less-immigrant-populated counterparts. Secondly, that those same native-born Americans have lower body mass indices, or BMIs. And thirdly, that these native-born Americans swimming in immigrant neighbors also have lower rates of hypertension. Okay, maybe we’re exaggerating that last part – there’s no swimming needed. But, the lower rates of hypertension still stand.

Whether you prefer Japanese, Korean, Mexican, Ethiopian – you’ll still see the benefits.

Instagram / @thesushiaddict

The great thing is that it doesn’t matter what kind of immigrants set up shop in your neighborhood, native-born Americans still see the benefit. “In places with a high density of immigrants, whether it’s Latino immigrants or Asian immigrants, their native-born neighbors also go shopping a lot in those ethnic grocery stores, like those Mexican supermarkets or Chinese supermarkets. They buy fruits and vegetables at significantly lower prices than they would get at places like Walmart or Trader Joe’s,” Lu Shi, the lead author of the paper, said.

Okay but there could be a lot of other reasons for why people in immigrant neighborhoods are healthier!

Instagram / @chronicledelicious

Here’s the beautiful thing: the study controlled, or took into account, things like socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and the level of education the respondents had received. So when the next neckbeard trolling on social media tries to argue with the findings, you can confidently say that the researchers know their stuff, and have ticked the boxes when it comes to conducting a legitimate study. In fact, you can even throw in the phrase, “the healthy immigrant effect,” to show that you’ve really done your homework. Essentially, it’s the tendency for US immigrants to have better health than their native-born counterparts.

There is one caveat: the study was conducted only on LA neighborhoods.

Instagram / @tortilla_inn

Now that being said, the study was conducted in Los Angeles County neighborhoods, so it’s possible that the findings have only revealed something that’s true for Los Angeles County. Chances are that the researchers will have to look into testing other neighborhoods before they can say for sure that they’ve truly stumbled onto a winner. But that’s not going to stop us proposing to the Trump administration that they need to reconsider their stance on immigration. Who’s to say now that stationing a few immigrant families in every neighborhood won’t improve the nation’s health?

Naturally, Twitter’s got the receipts: we’ve always known immigrants are good at eating healthy.

Twitter / @fabucat

Even though this savvy user was commenting way back in 2014, the statement still stands. If Barack Obama had gotten everyone on a diet of immigrant food, everyone would now not only be healthier, but also probably happier. We’re pretty sure it’s scientifically impossible to be unhappy after eating a delicious taco/dumpling/massaman curry.

This babe is on the money.

Twitter / @chloereichel

While the respondents for the study were still indulging in less-than-healthy practices, native-born Americans living in an area with a higher immigrant population had 67 percent lower odds of regularly eating fast food, and 64 percent higher odds of eating the recommended daily intake of fruit and vegetables, as per the guidelines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

It’s not just about the fact that immigrants eat healthier, they are healthier, too.

Twitter / @imthatholly

The interesting thing is that this commenter isn’t wrong. It’s not just about the fact that immigrants eat healthier, they are healthier, too. This is something that the paper’s lead author points out – on average, Latina women smoke at lower rates than their peers, so it stands to reason that they lead by example and create a culture of non-smoking. By extension, it’s these “contagious” social norms that may factor into why native-born Americans living in immigrant-dense neighborhoods in the study were healthier: they’ve caught the bug of living healthy, so to speak.

Before you get all excited and haul your butt to the Korean barbecue joint down the road with the justification that it’s healthy, we should probably point out Shi’s little caveat: “Ethnic food outlets, like the Mexican lunch truck, the Chinese barbecue that you see on New York streets, those are not necessarily healthier than McDonald’s, KFC.” Sorry babes.

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com

Report Shows That Immigration Narratives On TV Are Latinx-Focused And Over-Emphasize Crime

Entertainment

Report Shows That Immigration Narratives On TV Are Latinx-Focused And Over-Emphasize Crime

The media advocacy group Define American recently released a study that focused on the way immigrant characters are depicted on television. The second-annual study is entitled “Change the Narrative, Change the World”.

Although the study reports progress in some areas of onscreen representation, there is still a long way to go.

For example, the study reported that half of the immigrant characters depicted on television are Latino, which is consistent with reality. What is not consistent with reality, however, is how crime-related storylines are still an overrepresented theme in these storylines.

The study shows that on television 22% of immigrant characters have crime storylines show up as part of their narratives. These types of storylines further pedal the false narrative that immigrants are criminals, when in reality, they’re just everyday people who are trying to lives their best lives. Ironically, this statistic is an improvement on the previous year’s statistics in which crime themes made up 34% of immigrants’ stories on TV.

These numbers are further proof that the media feels stories of Latino immigration have to be about sadness and hardship in order to be worth watching.

According to Define American’s website, their organization believes that “powerful storytelling is the catalyst that can reshape our country’s immigration narrative and generate significant cultural change.”

They believe that changing the narratives depicted in entertainment media can “reshape our country’s immigration narrative and generate significant cultural change.” 

“We wanted to determine if seeing the specific immigration storylines influenced [viewers’] attitudes, behavior, or knowledge in the real world,” said Sarah Lowe, the associate director of research and impact at Define American to Variety. “And we were reassured and inspired to see the impact it had.” 

Define American’s founder, Jose Antonio Vargas, is relatively optimistic about the study’s outcomes, saying that the report has “some promising findings” and the numbers “provide [him] with hope”. He added that there are still “many areas in which immigrant representation can improve”.

via Getty Images

Namely, Vargas was disappointed in television’s failure to take an intersectional approach to immigration in regards to undocumented Black immigrants. 

“Black undocumented immigrants are detained and deported at higher rates than other ethnic groups,” Vargas told Variety. “But their stories are largely left off-screen and left out of the larger narrative around immigration.” 

“Change the Narrative, Change the World” also showed that Asian and Pacific Islander immigrants are also under-represented on television compared with reality. Also worth noting, male immigrants were over-represented on television compared to reality, while immigrants with disabilities were also under-represented.

The study also showed that when viewers are exposed to TV storylines that humanize immigrants, they’re more likely to take action on immigration issues themselves. 

The effect that fictional entertainment narratives have on viewers further proves that representation does, indeed, matter. What we watch as entertainment changes the way we think about other people’s lived experiences. And that, in turn, can change the world.

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com

A Group Of TPS Beneficiaries Are Touring The Country In A Bus To Save The Crucial Immigration Program

Things That Matter

A Group Of TPS Beneficiaries Are Touring The Country In A Bus To Save The Crucial Immigration Program

tps_alliance / Instagram

Updated September 23, 2020

A coalition of people is coming together to stand up for Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries. Federal judges recently gave the Trump administration the approval to end the status for 300,000 people in the U.S.

A group of Temporary Protect Status holders is on a road trip to save the program for 300,000 people.

The National TPS Alliance is driving across the country to engage voters about the need to protect the program. The “Road to Justice” road tour started in Los Angeles and will be stopping in 54 cities in 32 states. The tour ends in Washington, D.C. where the TPS holders will petition Congress directly to save the program.

The program was started in 1990 and offers safe refuge for people who’s countries have experienced disaster, civil unrest, or other extraordinary circumstances. Some people who have been granted TPS in the U.S. include Central Americans after Hurricane Mitch, the second-largest hurricane in the Atlantic, devastated large swaths of the region in 1998. Haitians were also given TPS after the earthquake that devastated Port Au Prince in 2010.

The organization is hoping to engage voters and get them to care about the immigration crisis facing the nation. Activists have already praised the group and pledged to support their cause at the ballot box.

“We are going to vote for justice, for the TPS community,” Angélica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, told NBC News. “President (Trump) and his administration are racist and do not care about the damage they are causing to our community.”

Original: A federal court just handed a huge ‘victory’ to the Trump administration, which has been eager to restart mass deportations. Despite a global health pandemic, the administration has been pressing forward with plans to deport hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants.

Until now, many of these migrants were safe from deportation thanks to Temporary Protected Status, which shields some immigrants from deportation under humanitarian claims. However, the recent court decision – in San Francisco’s 9th Circuit – gives Trump exactly what he wants right before the elections.

But how will it affect immigrant communities across the country? Here’s everything you need to know about this major decision.

The 9th Circuit Court just ended TPS for more than 300,000 undocumented immigrants.

A California appeals court on Monday gave the Trump Administration permission to end Temporary Protected Status for immigrants from El Salvador, Nicaragua, Haiti, and Sudan, clearing the way for officials to force more than 300,000 immigrants out of the country.

The decision affects people from all walks of life, many of whom have lived in the U.S. for decades, have U.S.-born children and have been considered essential workers during the coronavirus pandemic.

This week’s ruling from the circuit court comes after a district court (also in California) temporarily halted Trump’s plan to end TPS in late 2018 after a group of lawyers sued, arguing that Trump was motivated by racial discrimination.

“The president’s vile statements about TPS holders made perfectly clear that his administration acted out of racial animus,”Ahilan Arulanantham, a lawyer for the ACLU of Southern California, wrote in a statement. “The Constitution does not permit policy to be driven by racism. We will seek further review of the court’s decision.”

But today’s 2-1 decision reversed the district court’s temporary order and allowed the federal government to take away TPS protections while the court case continues.

ICE and DHS has promised to wait several months before taking away TPS status if the agency won in court. As a result, the ACLU told NPR that it expects the protections to start ending no sooner than March, meaning that Joe Biden could reverse the administration’s decision if he wins in November, though the organization plans to fight back in the meantime.

Temporary Protected Status was created to protect people in the U.S. from being sent back to dangerous places – and it’s saved lives.

Credit: Daniel Ortega / Getty Images

The TPS program was first introduced in 1990, and it has protected immigrants from more than 20 countries at various points since then. More than 300,000 people from 10 different nations currently use the program, some of whom have lived and worked in the United States for decades.

Trump has sharply criticized the program, sometimes along racial lines, and in one infamous and widely criticized incident two years ago, the president reportedly referred to the program’s beneficiaries as “people from shithole countries.”

TPS provides protection for short periods of up to 18 months, but the federal government has continuously extended it for the countries mentioned in the lawsuit “based on repeated findings that it remains unsafe to return.” 

As a result, it said, most TPS holders have been living in the U.S. for more than a decade, contributing to their communities and raising their families. Many of the more than 200,000 U.S.-citizen children of TPS holders have never been to the country their parents are from and would have to choose between their families and their homes.

The ruling will have a major impact on migrant families and communities across the U.S.

Credit: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Immigration advocacy groups are slamming the court’s ruling, noting it will impact hundreds of thousands of TPS holders as well as their families and communities. In a statement, Beth Werlin, executive director of the American Immigration Council, said the decision will “plunge their lives into further turmoil at a time when we all need greater certainty.” 

As the global pandemic stretches on, immigrants with protected status make up a large portion of the country’s front-line workers. More than 130,000 TPS recipients are essential workers, according to the Center for American Progress. 

“TPS recipients have deep economic and social roots in communities across the nation,” said Ali Noorani, president and CEO of the National Immigration Forum. “And, as the U.S. responds to the COVID-19 pandemic, TPS recipients are standing shoulder to shoulder with Americans and doing essential work.”

Notice any needed corrections? Please email us at corrections@wearemitu.com